Archive for April, 2009

Anderson Silva – Forrest Griffin set for UFC 101

After Anderson Silva’s disappointing decision win over Thales Leites, the second straight “boring” fight for the middleweight champion, UFC President Dana White said he would have a hard time convincing fans that his next fight would be any different.

There have been two problems with creating matchups for Silva, and White has solved both of them. First, it’s hard to think of anyone in his weight class that is a legitimate threat rather than someone with a “puncher’s chance.” Secondly, with Silva preferring to counter, his last two opponents seemed unwilling to put themselves in harm’s way, leading to boos for a boring fight. At UFC 101 in August, Silva will face light heavyweight Forrest Griffin, and things will be different.

It’s the perfect matchup. Griffin has never been in a boring fight. His are among the most exciting in the sport, and he’s not at his best until his face is bleeding. Excitement problem solved. But as a former champion, he’s also a worthy opponent. Silva’s previous jump up to light heavyweight was a quick knockout over middle-of-the-road James Irvin. Not sure he proved anything we didn’t already know in that fight.

White won’t have any trouble selling this event, which includes B.J. Penn vs. Kenny Florian for the lightweight championship. Fans may be frustrated with Silva, but they know what to expect with Griffin. Oh yes, there will be blood.

Feeling a little crabby over 49ers first round pick


Don’t tell me I’m supposed to be happy with that first round.

I think it’s about time to end the Michael Crabtree lovefest. Hands down, Crabs, Crab cakes, or whatever you want to call him (my personal favorite is Crabfest), is the greatest wide receiver in the 2009 NFL Draft, outranking the likes of Oakland’s pick, Darrius Heyward-Bey, by a longshot and a steal at No. 10 for the San Francisco 49ers.

But was Crabs really the answer for San Francisco? I don’t think so.

While the pick both excited and stimulated all of 49ers nation into hype not seen since Alex Smith was drafted first overall in 2005, it also killed any hope for what was expected to be the selection of Smith’s replacement.

With Matthew Stafford off the board two days prior and the New York Jets taking USC’s Mark Sanchez, hopes were slim as the remaining talent was heavily scrutinized.

All the while, all the pundits overlooked little old Josh Freeman of Kansas State, selected No. 17 overall by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. He was written off for playing in a poor conference, being a project quarterback and generally not being the cool character that everyone knows Sanchez portrays.

There was so much scrutiny between the Stafford and Sanchez themselves, there wasn’t enough room to bring Freeman into the argument. Not to mention the fact that the 49ers were waddling over selecting one of the top-rated tackles or linebackers, Crabs was a pleasant surprise at No. 10.

“We had a head-on issue with it,” Singletary told the media on draft day. “You’ve got Michael Oher there, you’ve got (Michael) Crabtree. So what do you do? You want to tear up something. You’d like for it to be Crabtree or it’s Michael Oher. But when they’re both there at the same time and how we had our board, Crabtree is one of the best players in the draft so you’ve got to go there.”

You can say The Crabster’s availability threw a wrench in the 49ers’ planning. Or, if you’re thinking as nefariously as I am, the Raiders ruined the 49ers’ plans by passing up on the Texas Tech phenom.

How could they? As a two-time Biletnikoff winner, he was deserving of being the first receiver picked — bad foot and all. He’ll certainly prove his worth for years to come and Old Al will have to read it in his own local newspaper to boot.

Nice.

But the 49ers were quick to jump the gun. Considering there are now 10 wide receivers on the roster, including Isaac Bruce, Josh Morgan, Arnaz Battle and Jason Hill, there won’t be enough balls to go around with all the development in the works.

The beautiful part about the NFL draft is there’s always room for redemption. The 49ers did their own version of addressing the quarterback issue and redeeming hopes in the future of the franchise’s lead role by picking up Ball State quarterback Nate Davis in the fifth round.

As Singletary put it, the guy was a steal. But don’t let him get your hopes up, he’ll have to put in at least a year carrying the clip board.

“This year, we’ve got Alex Smith and we’ve got Shaun Hill,” Singletary said. “Those two guys are competing for that job and at the quarterback position right now that’s enough to look at and focus on.”

One thing is for sure, and worthy of praise, there is a plan and there is focus. That’s promising.

Editor’s note: This column originally appeared in The Union.

Al Davis ruins mock drafts everywhere

Mock drafts are hard to do. Really, they’re impossible. There’s always a surprise early in the first round, and if you didn’t see it coming, the rest of your mock is thrown off track. Al Davis knows this. He’s made it a point to make fools of all those who would dare tell him what the sensible move would be, mock drafters included.

Zuri got off to a nice start with the first two picks, and did a great job with the Jets jumping up into the top 10 and picking Mark Sanchez. But Jeremy Maclin? Ha! You were way off! If I had the guts to do my own mock, I probably would’ve had the Raiders taking Maclin too. Second rated receiver in most minds, but a bigger deep threat. Davis wanted an even bigger deep threat with even more speed, and chose Darrius Heyward-Bey. Huh?

Davis topped himself in the second round, picking safety Mike Mitchell at 47. ESPN draft guru Mel Kiper had Mitchell ranked 73rd … at his position. So potentially, he could have gone in the 7th round and still been a bad pick. It’s no surprise where the biggest reach of the draft landed. Poor kid will forever be linked to this pick that even he probably thought was much too high.

While this all makes me laugh, it also kills me that Maclin got picked up at 19 by the Eagles, who are finally coming to terms with the fact that they need receivers to win in the postseason. They’ve got a nice group of them now, and that worries me. I feel better knowing that McNabb still can’t play in big games, until the league allows bounce passes.

As for my Cowboys, I’m extremely excited about their draft selections because … well, what other choice do I have? Might as well be optimistic in the offseason, cause it’s probably not getting any better. Dallas didn’t pick at all until round three, and I haven’t heard of a single player they got. But they did end up with 12 total picks, the most of any team, so at least we can play the numbers game.

The Giants got Plaxico’s replacement in Hakeem Nicks, and top prospect Brian Orakpo fell to the Redskins at 13. The NFC East isn’t getting any easier.

As for Zuri’s Niners, how in the world did you get this lucky? Michael Crabtree could end up being their best receiver since Terrell Owens. Combine that with Alex Smith … or Shaun Hill … well anyway, he’s a good receiver.

NFL mock draft: Top 10 picks with comments


Been scouring all the mock drafts out there. I think it’s appropriate I do one for myself, at least through the first 10 picks. After that, it just gets sketchy. Without further ado, here we go:

  1. Detroit Lions (0-16 last season): Matthew Stafford, Georgia — It’s sad that Daunte Culpepper didn’t work out for the hapless Lions, but it really illuminates their struggles. After being on a wide receiver binge for the last six years, they’ll likely draft to build first rather than win first. It’s a no-brainer, especially with the worries about Mark Sanchez and the USC quarterback’s who have floundered after being drafted as of late (ah hem, Matt Leinart).
  2. St. Louis Rams (2-14): Jason Smith, Baylor — With the departure of Orlando Pace, and the struggles the Rams had in pass protection (45 sacks) and rushing (103 yards per game), they’ll focus in on the basis. And that starts up front with the hogs. The big if is whether Smith gets the nod, or Eugene Monroe from Virgina. Consider this a toss up of the two.
  3. Kansas City Chiefs (2-14): Aaron Curry, Wake Forest — After filling the quarterback hole, rethinking the tight end position (departure of Tony Gonzalez and signing of Sean Ryan) and having a new general manager to lead the draft, all eyes point to talent above need. Curry is the talent that most observers are saying is the “safe” pick, even though he’s marked as a guy who would flourish in a 3-4 defense, he’ll easily adjust. He looks that good.
  4. Seattle Seahawks (4-12): Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech — He’s my favorite player in this draft. If you recall, last season the Seahawks went into the year with four or five receivers injured. They started signing guys off the street and it was just getting ridiculous after awhile. And then of course, this offseason people started looking at Matt Hasselback like he was the problem, or more nicely, the future problem. They’ve got one major need and Crabtree fills it. They’d be stupid to draft anywhere else so high.
  5. Cleveland Browns (4-12): BJ Raji, Boston College — After getting this whole positive/negative drug test results cleared up, it appears the big defensive tackle will still be in the top-10. What better place to go than Cleveland, which gave up 356 yards a game (25th in the NFL) and finished with only 17 sacks last season. This Raji’s 337 pounds would help, if not now, down the line.
  6. Cincinnati Bengals (4-11-1): Eugene Monroe, Virginia — Every year I think the Bengals should focus on the basics (blocking and running) and every year I’m a little more disappointed. Here goes wishful thinking.
  7. Oakland Raiders (5-11): Jeremy Maclin, Missouri — Al Davis has apparently taken a liking to the Missouri wide receiver. It comes as no surprise that Davis is a sucker for potent threats. Talent first, need second. In this case, Maclin fills a need and a want.
  8. New York Jets (from Jacksonville Jaguars): Mark Sancehz, USC — As much as you (OK, really me) want to knock what Trojan quarterbacks have done in the pros lately, he’s the best thing available for this team with a quarterback identity issue.
  9. Green Bay Packers (6-10): Brian Orakpo, Texas — The recent moves by the Packers to fix up their offensive line before the draft gives me the distinct hint they’re posturing toward a defensive player. This is a good time to take Orakpo, a defensive end who had 23 sacks in 21 starts for the Longhorns. They build football players at that school.
  10. San Francisco 49ers (7-9): Andre Smith, Alabama — In a draft lacking a lot of depth, the 49ers will immediately fill a hole with Smith at tackle. Pass protection has been an issue the last few years. But even more important will be Mike Singletary’s emphasis on the running game. While a quarterback would be the team’s pick of choice, their top choice (Stafford) will be long gone by this point. And other top tackles will be gone, so Smith falls here by default. Josh Freeman, the No. 3 quarterback in most draft rankings, may not be sexy enough for the 49ers to grab here. But if it were up to me, they’d totally do it.

Here are some good mock drafts you should be aware of:

Who I should’ve picked in my fantasy baseball draft

Tim Lincecum / AP photo
Been taking heat from people about my “homer” pick, a pitcher in the first round of our fantasy baseball team.

I’m still laughing at that one.

I posted here my entire fantasy draft. There are 10 people in my league to give you some sort of idea of how long it took people to draft. As noted before, I took Tim Lincecum fourth overall. That’s the same Tim Lincecum that led the majors in strikeouts and took the Cy Young last year.

What I realized, before any criticism could be leveled and my draft had occurred, is that some players are invariably more valuable than any particular formula designed for fantasy sports. Football is a good example.

In fantasy football, generally speaking, users are encouraged to select a running back with their first and possibly second picks. But if you’ve been following the league in the last three years, there really is only five top backs. After that, they are all middle of the road in terms of production (rushing yards, touchdowns, receiving yards). After that top five, if there is a player that equates in terms of production points, it would be wise to take that player. Most recently, quarterback Tom Brady filled that role. Fifty passing touchdowns in one year will do that to a formula. Tony Romo also comes to mind. When Michael Vick returns, he’ll also be a player to look at in that situation.

My point is, Lincecum fills that role. With 265 strikeouts in 227 innings last year, he averaged 1.16 an inning. One in every 3 1/2 batters, he struck out. That’s absolutely amazing. In fact, so amazing, they gave him a nice piece of hardware for it. That’s pretty valuable. More so than some corner infielder that will possibly slump for a month.

Admittedly, after Lincecum’s rough start, I worried that he was making the “homer” remark look very accurate. But he’s bounced back, tallying 13 strikeouts in his last start. (That’s the Timmy I love.)

But I digress. If I didn’t pick Lincecum at the No. 4 spot, I would’ve had some very nice options available to me. In fact, you could say I jumped the gun in that regard. (What can I say, I’m a biased Giants fan). There were easily seven players to choose from who are absolutely dynamic. I was lucky enough to pick up two of them in the next two rounds. But out of my reach and off the table at No. 4 were Hanley Ramirez, Albert Pujols and Jose Reyes.

Personally, I don’t think Ramirez was worthy of the hype. And if Pujols was there at No. 4, I would’ve grabbed him. He’s just dope.

While I don’t regret taking Lincecum, I could see with conventional wisdom going after Josh Hamilton (went No. 8) or Dustin Pedroia (No. 11 in 2nd round).

(How sad is this, I can’t even make a decision between those two.)

It’s weird, after I took Lincecum, the guy after me took Johan Santana. CC Sabathia was the next pitcher taken in the second round, 16th overall.

What’s your fantasy baseball draft strategy? Top player on the table? Or your favorite player on the table? By need first, or want first? Answer below.


Related:

Greasegate II – Anderson Silva

Somehow I missed this on fight night, but Anderson Silva is the second champion to be accused of greasing. Georges St. Pierre was greased in his second fight against B.J. Penn by his trainer, although the impact it had on the fight and the intent was debatable. Both seem pretty clear this time.

Silva and Thales Leites could have fought in a vaseline pool Saturday night and it wouldn’t have affected the outcome. It’s the intent that is the real problem. Silva can be seen rubbing his face and moving some of that vaseline to his chest, stomach and arms.

While it’s disturbing to see him so obviously greasing, I’m much more disturbed by his performance in his last two fights. Is it possible some of that grease dripped onto the floor, and Leites was slipping to the ground instead of intentionally falling? Probably not, but that’s the excuse I think he should use. I’d love to hear him use this as an excuse like B.J. did. Then I’d like the guy a little more for making me laugh.

UPDATE: Silva’s manager Ed Soares said the greasing charges were “ridiculous,” but offered a fairly ridiculous excuse.

“How much Vaseline can they put on someone’s eyebrows that’s going to make a difference?” Soares said. “Where’s he going to wipe it? If he wasn’t wiping it on his shorts, where would he wipe it? It wasn’t like he was rubbing it in. He just took it off. We didn’t put it on. It was [the cutman] that put it on.”

Excuse me then, he wasn’t greasing, he was just wiping off the vaseline … on his chest and arms. What choice did he have? There was too much on his face. Soares also defended Silva’s performance in the fight, which has come under criticism.

“He did everything that people questioned he could do,” he said. “When it went to the ground, Thales Leites couldn’t pass his guard. The question if he could go five rounds? He went five rounds without breaking a sweat for 25 minutes. What else does the guy have to do? Is the only thing they want to see is knockouts? Then, put fighters against [Silva] that will stand and bang with him, not guys that will fall on their backs.”

I agree with the last part, but I don’t know if going five rounds without breaking a sweat is something to be proud of.

Silva disappoints again at UFC 97

Dana White can not be happy. In building up the UFC as its president, White said he learned a lot from boxing on what not to do. Too many times, he’s said in interviews, viewers paid $60 for a boxing event, then turned off the TV at the end of the night and said, “Damn. They did it to me again. They didn’t fight.” That’s exactly what happened at UFC 97 in Montreal.

The supposed pound-for-pound king Anderson Silva was coming off a crowd-displeasing win over Patrick Cote in 2008 in which there was very little fighting before Cote blew out a knee in round three. At least someone got hurt in that fight. His UFC 97 fight against Thales Leites was worse – five full championship rounds of patty-cake.

“I personally apologize for what happened tonight,” White said. “You guys know this is not what the UFC was built on. This is not the way fights usually go.”

“I’m personally unhappy with the whole fight. I did not like the fight at all, period, on either side.”

Credit to White for maintaining his brutal honesty even when it puts his business in a bad light. And he’s right, both fighters were to blame. Leites’ game plan, apparently, was to draw Silva in close and then fall onto his back, hoping to draw the champion down with him. Silva instead chose to stare at his opponent, kick his leg, then put his hands on his hips and walk away.

I can understand not wanting to go to the ground with an opponent who could beat you there, but Silva should have backed up sooner if he wanted Leites on his feet, rather than wasting 10 to 15 seconds deciding which leg to kick. And Leites should have realized his falling over strategy wasn’t working (and was truly pathetic). At some point in a fight, an attack needs to be launched, and neither fighter did that. Leites won round two with a take-down, while Silva won three or four rounds by throwing a leg kick or leg punch (yes) every 15 seconds or so. Quite simply, they didn’t fight.

The Canadian crowd, booing for much of the 25 minutes, broke out into two chants of G-S-P for their hometown hero, welterweight champ Georges St. Pierre, and one chant of BULL-SHIT. An embarrassed White wasn’t smiling when he put the championship belt around Silva’s waist.


“We run a fight company, and when guys don’t fight, we sit down (with them) and have a conversation on why they’re not fighting,” White said. “This is what I do. It’s like having any other business and the guy doesn’t come out and perform at work.”

“I’m in the business of selling fights, and I think I’m pretty good at it. But I’m going to have a hard time letting people know that, ‘I promise, his next one is going to be good.’ I need to talk to him and figure out what’s going on and why this is happening.”

Silva said afterward that he was unable to finish Leites, I say he never tried. Silva said he showed he was in good shape and could go five rounds, I say I could’ve lasted those five rounds and I’m in terrible shape.

“I don’t know if it’s that people don’t understand my style of fighting, but I go out there to train to try and be efficient and have a perfect fight,” Silva said through his manager and interpreter, Ed Soares, at the conference. “Not every fight is going to be a knockout, and not every fight is going to be some spectacular finish.”

White said that Silva is still the pound-for-pound best, I say it’s St. Pierre. Why is it a given that Silva is the best? Their skills are comparable, but Silva has now gone 7 1/2 rounds without fighting. GSP has never done that.

In the co-main event, Chuck Liddell received more cheers in another knockout loss to Mauricio “Shogun” Rua than Silva did in his win. Liddell may have lost, but he came to fight and put it all on the line. This fight was almost identical to the Rashad Evans loss. Liddell looked good, although a step slower at almost 40 years old, and was narrowly winning the fight before suffering his third knockout in the four recent losses.

He’s taken too much punishment, and no longer has the chin to hang with the best anymore. I was rooting for Chuck to begin his comeback tour, but even I’m hoping for retirement this time. As of today, I have him as the best light heavyweight fighter of all time.

There is no strength of schedule

The NFL released the 2009-10 schedule this week and got major coverage on ESPN, NFL Network (surprise) and other places starving for football. Only the NFL can make something so simple into an event discussed by everyone. It’s hardly thrilling, but hey, it’s something to talk about. It temporarily scratches our itch.

I like it for a few reasons. 1) I like everything the NFL does. 2) I like to see how many games my Cowboys will get on national TV (league best six, god damn right). 3) To see when the season starts and who starts it, so I can start counting down the minutes to kickoff. 4) To see which games got prime time Sunday and Monday night slots.

It’s fun, it’s exciting, and that’s all it should be. We don’t need to start using the schedules to predict how well a team will do. I’m hearing way too much about certain team’s strength of schedule and how it will help or hurt them. What strength of schedule? Everybody is .000.

Why hasn’t anybody learned that basing anything on last year is pointless? Bad teams will become good, good teams will become bad, and teams will win and lose games they shouldn’t have. The schedule simply can’t be factored into that.

The Dolphins supposedly have the toughest schedule with a .594 winning percentage for their opponents. The Bears have it the easiest at .414 (factoring in two games against the .000 Lions of course). These numbers are based on last year’s teams, not this year’s. In this age of parity, Detroit could go 9-7 and make the playoffs. It’s happened before. The Dolphins went from 1-15 to 11-5, certainly throwing off some preseason strength of schedule numbers. The Cardinals may get a Super Bowl hangover and go 5-11. The Cowboys may be better without T.O. The Bucs may be worse without Jeff Garcia. The Raiders will suck.

So look forward to the matchups you like, circle dates on the calendar, talk trash, but remember that just because the Chargers and Chiefs’ opponents won .484 of their games doesn’t mean they have an easier path to a division title because the Broncos and Raiders’ opponents were .480. Please throw these numbers out.

Some thoughtful words on Tim Lincecum

Tim Lincecum

Grant at McCoveyChronicles.com, a sports blog nation blog on the San Francisco Giants, lists his 10 reasons why the he’s not worried about Tim Lincecum after his faulty two starts to begin the season. There’s some gems in the list. Particularly:

7. Young pitchers are a static, predictable group without a propensity for wildly fluctuating performances. “If a young pitcher is good one year, he’s always good the next.” – Bill Jaymes, the well-known Dutch baseball analyst and author of The Bill Jaymes Baseball Abstrakt.

Also:

4. The fielding behind him has been atrocious. There’s no guarantee that the fielding will get better, mind you, but it seems like every miscue this season has led to runs. There will be at least some margin for error.

Check out his full post at the blog. I just joined the blog (as a fan) and I’m currently waiting for the 24-hour moratorium to end before I can post any comments. For some reason, the exclusivity makes me think it’s really cool. I could be wrong. But so far, I love the insight. That says something, right?

Follow up on my last column, “Betting on disclosure”

I realize that I might have left a little interest as to who I picked up on my fantasy baseball teams. I think I did a pretty good job with my picks, however poorly they’re doing for me through week 1. (I’m told I have to have patience in fantasy baseball.)

Anyways, I selected a big-name crowd for the most part. The crown jewel of which is Tim Lincecum, who has struggled through his first two starts. I’ve got faith in him though that he’ll bounce back. Don’t sit on the kid for long.

Here’s my draftees taken directly from Yahoo! Sports:

Team: addisports
1. (4) Tim Lincecum
2. (17) Evan Longoria
3. (24) Carlos Beltrán
4. (37) Geovany Soto
5. (44) Alexei Ramírez
6. (57) Adam Dunn
7. (64) Dan Haren
8. (77) J.J. Hardy
9. (84) Nate McLouth
10. (97) Joakim Soria
11. (104) Joba Chamberlain
12. (117) Fred Lewis
13. (124) Derrek Lee
14. (137) Ricky Nolasco
15. (144) Brian Fuentes
16. (157) John Danks
17. (164) Lastings Milledge
18. (177) Scott Baker
19. (184) Willy Taveras
20. (197) Plácido Polanco
21. (204) Mike Napoli

Notice the selection of Fred Lewis, who is batting like crazy in left field (9-of-20, .450 average, three doubles and a triple). Only problem is he’s acting like a lemming in left field, throwing a crazy off the mark relay in the opener and misjudging a fly ball in a loss to the San Diego Padres this weekend.